Ray LaHood, current US Secretary of Transportation and a former Republican member of the House of Representatives, may want to stay off the road, where it’s safe. His new proposal plans to give bicycling and walking the same importance as automobiles in transportation planning and selection of federal greenbacks. “This is the end of favoring motorized transportation at the expense of non-motorized,” he wrote in his blog. In my opinion, it seems he wants to add a little European flavor to the way we travel. If that’s where his policies are headed, I am totally on board. During 2004 I spent 3 weeks in Slovakia and during my time I observed that damn near every person got around on bicycles, scooters, walking, trolleys, micro cars, etc; AND they had no translation for the word “obese.” However, many people will stay in their box, calling the policy “nonsensical.” Congressman Steve LaTourette reacted to LaHood’s policy by asking, jokingly, if the department still has mandatory drug testing.
An extension of Obama’s “livability initiative,” which seeks the creation of alternatives to driving – buses, streetcars, trolleys and trains, biking and walking – as key components of the solution to the American transportation headache. One included idea in the policy that gets the Mr. Hats seal of approval is the creation of biking and walking lanes on bridges and clearing snow from bike paths. The biking lane is key in American culture, where many 3 person families absolutely must have an H3 to get around the world. I like riding my bicycle, but not sharing the road with a murderously angry soccer mom in a Hummer full of sugar-crazed children.
As Jon Stewart puts it, Secretary of Transportation is the “least glamorous cabinet position.” However, LaHood has been the gung-ho transportation policy point man on a multitude of high-profile issues, from hi-speed railways to the recent issues with Toyota. His new policy has garnered him understandable celebrity status wtihin the cycling subculture. “LaHood went out on a limb for cyclists,” Joe Lindsey wrote on Bicycling.com. “He said stuff no Transportation secretary’s ever said, and is backing it up with action.”
Word of the policy is still seeping beyond the transportation world, and the initial reaction from conservatives and industry has been: hostile, of course. The National Association of Manufacturers’ blog, Shopfloor.org, referred to the policy as “dumb and irresponsible,” going on to say that “LaHood’s pedal parity is nonsensical for a modern industrial nation,” said the blog. “We don’t call it sacrilege, but radical is a fair description. It is indeed a sea change in federal transportation policy that could have profound implications for the U.S. economy and the 80 percent of freight that moves by truck.” LaHood has said he was surprised by their response, “it didn’t seem that controversial to me,” he wrote in a second blog item. “After all, I didn’t say they should have the only voice. Just a voice.”
I can understand why conservatives and big industry representatives are hostile to the concept. It proposes possible change… possible big change to the way they do business. And we are all very familiar with how Americans often treat change: hostility, stonewalling, and blathering confused resilience. However, it’s LaHood’s view that our federal government simply shouldn’t take a position that roads and trains simply trump walking and biking. He views all modes of transportation as “real” transportation, and funding should support all of it as a whole. I think if we approached all transportation with equality, it would help change America for the better on more fronts than just transportation. We could probably stop putting so many extra notches in our belts, and be able to breathe easy.
| The Daily Show With Jon Stewart | Mon – Thurs 11p / 10c | |||
| Ray LaHood | ||||
|
||||





Enter Twitter co-founder 